WMI 1.5?

…. et al. wrote:
> Bill in Co. wrote:
>
>> Thanks for some of this info. I tried that MS link, but it’s apparently
>> out of date now ("Content Not Found").
>
> That’s why i locally save potentially useful internet-info i
> find. Sorry, i didn’t try to load the link before posting.
> ‘AutostartWin9X’ is (at the time of writing this) mentioned at:
> <http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa394522.aspx>

OK, thanks, yeah that works better. :-)
(btw, the info you copied in below is quite interesting, TNX)

A bit more below…

> From the other (now defunct) link i posted earlier:
>
> <quote>
> The Windows Management service starts automatically on komputers
> running Microsoft Windows NT or Windows 2000, but not on
> komputers running Windows 95 or Windows 98. To set up the Windows
> Management service to start automatically on a Windows 95 or
> Windows 98 system, you must make the following changes to the
> operating system registry.
>
> The following procedure describes how to set up the Windows
> Management service to run automatically on a komputer running
> Windows 95 or Windows 98.
>
> To set up the Windows Management service to run automatically on
> a komputer running Windows 95 or Windows 98
>
> 1. In the registry, navigate to the value named
> EnableRemoteConnect?.
> 2. Under the key HKLM\SOFTWARE\MICROSOFT\OLE, set EnableDCOM?
> to "Y" if it is not set to "Y" already. "Y" is the default setting.
> 3. In the registry under the key HKLM\SOFTWARE\MICROSOFT\OLE,
> set EnableRemoteConnect? to "Y". The default setting for the
> EnableRemoteConnect? value is "N" for Windows 95 or Windows 98
> systems.
> 4. Place the following entry in the registry to enable the
> WMI automatic start feature:
>
> \HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\wbem\cimom - AutostartWin9X
> 5. Set the AutostartWin9X value to either "1" or "2". The
> following table lists possible values for AutostartWin9X and
> their meanings.
> Value Meaning
> "0" Manual
>
> Use this setting when you do not need the service running
> continuously. When a local request comes in, WMI starts to
> service the request. If you later restart the komputer, the
> komputer will start in manual mode (WMI will not start
> automatically).

That’s probably the way I’d go, if I install it just for this one small app
(but that’s still up in the air at this point)

> Note that remote startup requests are only supported on
> Windows NT or Windows 2000. Remote startup requests are not
> supported by COM on Windows 95 or Windows 98.
> "1" Automatic if the komputer system needs to reload
>
> Use this setting if you would normally have active event
> consumers. If WMI has active event consumers and the system (any
> system that supports WMI) needs to be restarted, WMI starts
> automatically after the system starts.
> "2" Automatic
>
> Windows Management service always starts automatically.
> 6. Add the file Winmgmt.exe to the komputer’s Startup
> directory. You can find this file in the \Windows\WBEM directory.
>
> </quote>
>
> … so to stop it, check that everything is the opposite way.
>
>
>> Why did you want it to stop running after each boot (you said you grew
>> tired
>> of it)? Did it noticeably use some extra resources, or what?
>
> No, i had no problems whatsoever with it that i know of, and
> didn’t really keep tabs on my resources. I just tested it, but
> don’t know that i ever had anything using/needing it. I think you
> use SFC in the same unorthodox way i do to monitor installs and
> changes .. and mostly i grow tired of seeing a couple of WMI logs
> always showing up. I wasn’t allowed to uninstall it, but at least
> i could try to disable it as much as possible.

I see. And yeah, I *do* monitor the SFC log before and after program
installs, almost without exception (and in a few cases, it’s saved my butt).

>> I only have three files (all DLLs) in the WBEM folder, but the folder
>> date
>> is useless, since I had reinstalled Windows. However the DLL file dates
>> are Sept 2002, yet the DLL file version numbers are 5.2!
>
> Here is a SFC-log from installing the Win98FE WMI optional
> component (c.f. [WBEM.inf]):
>
> [D:\WIN4\SYSTEM\WBEM]
> CIM16NET.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> CIM32NET.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> CIMWIN32.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> FASTPROX.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> FRAMEDYN.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> MOFD.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> STDPROV.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WBEMCOMN.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WBEMCORE.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WBEMDISP.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WBEMESS.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WBEMPROX.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WBEMSVC.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WMIPROV.DLL Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> CIMOM.EXE Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> MOFCOMP.EXE Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> UNSECAPP.EXE Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WBEMCPL.EXE Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WBEMIHLP.EXE Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WBEMTEST.EXE Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> WBEMUSER.EXE Added 1.00.450.00 98-05-06
> CIMWIN32.MOF Added 98-05-06
> REGEVENT.MOF Added 98-05-06
> WMI.MOF Added 98-05-06
> WBEMDISP.TLB Added 98-05-06
>
> (end)

Wow. Clearly I only have a subset (probably ONLY those that would be
needed by a .NET Framework 1.1 app (which, to be perfectly honest, I don’t
think I have running anymore). But my memory might be off.

Anyways, thanks for all the info.

>> I just checked my SFC log, and see it got added when I installed .NET
>> Framework version 1.1. Interesting…. So I assuming it’s WBEM
>> version
>> 1.x, anyways. :-)
>>
>> … et al. wrote:
>>> Bill in Co. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Anybody installed this (Windows Management Instrumentation 1.5)?
>>>> And
>>>> without any problems? No problems or gotchas were mentioned on the
>>>> MS
>>>> download site that I could see.
>>> I’ve installed it and also the version that comes with Win98. I
>>> don’t know that i had any problem from having either one
>>> installed, but there are two gotchas .. #1) IIRC, neither version
>>> can be uninstalled. ( WMI is ms implementation of WBEM and )
>>> IIRC, it is present as ‘Web-Based Enterprise Management (WBEM)’
>>> under ‘Internet Tools’ but will disappear from there when you
>>> install it. Again IIRC, WMI 1.5 will warn you about it when you
>>> run the installer.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Anyways, I found an app that required it.
>>> Well, i don’t know that i ever had one, so my logs looked like:
>>>
>>> …
>>> (Wed Oct 25 22:22:48 2006) : Core physically unloaded!
>>> (Thu Oct 26 00:18:46 2006) : Core physically unloaded!
>>> (Thu Oct 26 13:19:07 2006) : Core physically unloaded!
>>> (Thu Oct 26 14:43:08 2006) : Core physically unloaded!
>>> (Fri Oct 27 01:31:17 2006) : Core physically unloaded!
>>> (Fri Oct 27 22:41:02 2006) : Core physically unloaded!
>>> (Sat Oct 28 10:43:45 2006) : Core physically unloaded!
>>> …
>>>
>>> Gotcha #2) There is no GUI to stop it from running at each boot,
>>> so when i grow tired of it, (IIRC) i added ‘AutostartWin9X=0′ at
>>> ‘HKLM\Software\Microsoft\WBEM\CIMOM’ and perhaps the other stuff
>>> mentioned at ‘HowTo Automatically Invoking WMI on Win95 and Win98′:
>>> <http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms737971.aspx>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I don’t know what the base
>>>> version is on Windows98SE (assuming there is one, and that its even
>>>> installed).
>>> (1998-05-06) WMI 1.00.0450.00xx (with ‘Win98FE’) (SFC limitation)
>>> (1999-04-23) WMI 1.10.0698.0000 (with ‘Win98SE’)
>>>
>>>> Well, I did see a wmi.dll on this system, but the version number makes
>>>> no
>>>> sense (like 5.0).
>>> If you have it installed you should have a folder
>>> ‘%WinDir%\System\WBEM\’ with lots of stuff in it.
>>> If you already installed WMI 1.5, look at the date of the ‘WBEM’ folder.
>>
>>
>
>
> –
> Nah-ah. I’m staying out of this. … Now, here’s my opinion.
>
> Please followup in the newsgroup.
> E-mail address is invalid due to spam-control.

read more

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Comments are closed.